Monday, August 29, 2016

Contacting an editor

When is it appropriate to contact the editor of a journal? While the editor cannot write your paper for you, he or she can offer suggestions on topics and answer writing related questions. A few common ones I receive are: Is this an appropriate topic for your journal? (Most academic topics in the social and health sciences are appropriate) Is there writing help available? (Yes, but only at the discretion of the editor) How long will it take to get a response from reviewers? (Usually 4-6 weeks, sometimes longer, if it is difficult to get reviewers)

What is the proper protocol for such questions? Check the journal's website, there should be a contact the editors email or link (for the Journal of Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences it is jsbhs@waldenu.edu). Write an email that clearly indicates the information you are seeking or your question (a little background often helps), give your name and email info.

This s a good opportunity to mention, I do have some information sheets available, just write and ask me (jsbhs@waldenu.edu). They are:
Rewriting your dissertation into an article for publication
How to review journal articles

Monday, August 22, 2016

Researcher Mentor Interview: Jay Greiner

1. Please briefly describe your current mentees' research. 
Current research efforts of dissertation students for whom I serve as Dissertation Mentor, Chair, and Committee Member are completing their research focused on Developmental, Health and Organizational Psychology.  One current research study in collaboration with Mt. Sinai Hospital in New York City is examining how painful peripheral neuropathy is experienced by comparing individuals with HIV and those with diabetes, as both groups experience this pain. One difference emerging is the perception of what it means to express pain, and whether it is acceptable to share their pain.  In another unrelated qualitative dissertation study of social isolation in the elderly who live alone, current research data is being analyzed utilizing the Colaizzi method and interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA).  Early analysis suggests the elderly do not access available resources that might prevent loneliness and isolation.  A contact information resource guide for the elderly is being developed, including local, state, and federal programs.

2. How did you come to be a mentor? 
Serving as a dissertation research mentor, doctoral candidates bring amazing research ideas to the table, and my goal is to nurture the development of the research proposal and implementation of the research study.  Being trained as a Developmental Psychologist, and Physician Assistant, and serving on the Health Psychology Faculty at Walden University, my research focus has been biopsychosocial development over the lifespan, and health psychology is certainly a part of this approach.

3. What do like best about mentoring research?
The exciting aspect of doing research is development of a research study that builds on our current knowledge base in the area of health psychology and human development. Accessing current peer-reviewed research brings home the realization that there are other researchers in the US and around the globe who are interested in learning more about specific developmental and health-related psychological issues.  Building our knowledge base, with resulting social change implications is very exciting and very meaningful.  I enjoy mentoring doctoral candidates and working with professional Psychologist colleagues, and the team effort is very rewarding.

4. What do you dislike the most about mentoring research? 
There are days when the research process can seem long and delayed, but part of the sense of accomplishment is experiencing the day by day revisions and improvement in a research proposal or final research project, and the implementation, dissemination and publication of the research efforts. Success is accomplished by standing up, even when you fall down.

5. Advice for new researchers who would like to be published?
One suggestion for new researchers is to become involved in research that greatly interests you, and in an area where may have personal or professional experience or knowledge. The most common suggestion I give to potential researchers who want to publish is to determine your audience.  Who is it that would want to read and understand your research?  An approach that is useful is to examine the journals that you cite in your research literature review, and examine those journals as potential sources for publication or presentation at local, regional or national professional organization meetings.

Monday, August 15, 2016

Updating your literature

If you are working on rewriting your dissertation into an article for publication, be sure that you update your literature. Research moves quickly these days with the internet, and you want to make sure when your paper is published it has the most current thinking. Authors often forget to check on literature related to theory, which can get them into trouble, so do your homework!


Monday, August 8, 2016

Researcher Interview: Dr. Rick J. Cicchetti


Dr. Cicchetti recently published an article, based on his dissertation at Walden, with JSBHS: Perceived Competency in Grief Counseling: Implications for Counselor Education! Check it out at: http://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/jsbhs/vol10/iss1/2/

1. Please briefly describe your current research.
Perceived Competency in Grief Counseling. The study examined whether Rehabilitation Counseling students in their practica or internship perceived if they were adequately trained in their Masters level Rehabilitation Counseling Program to work with clients experiencing issues related to grief.

2 How did you come to be in this area of study?
I have a sister and a brother who have an acquired disability. The person with an acquired disability is grieving the loss of what use to be.  Both attended a program through Rehabilitation Counseling. I observed both were or seemed to be misdiagnosed. They were diagnosed with issue related to depression. Depression is a characteristic of grief. Especially with a person who has an acquired disability. If a person is misdiagnosed, chances are very good they are being receiving improper medication. Thus my interest in the topic

3. What do like best about doing research?
The idea my observations might possibly add to existing data.

4. What do you dislike the most about doing research?
Conducting extensive literature reviews to examine what research had been conducted about the topic.

5. Advice for new researchers who would like to be published?

Do not take feedback personally, especially from peer reviewers. They are in place to ensure your work meets the standards for publishing. Take a step back. Process the feedback, and if you do not understand any of the feedback, ask for clarity. We are all here to help you publish. 

Monday, August 1, 2016

Criticism

How do you deal with criticism? A few common examples are: being told that your writing needs help, that you have to do yet another revision, or your paper is rejected by the journal. There are a number of possible responses to such news. You can deny that there is a problem; you can argue with the critic; or you can pout and refuse to respond to them.

A better solution is to take control and ask yourself what I can do to fix this? If writing help is suggested, listen to the comments and form a plan of action. It may help to work with a former faculty member or ask the editor if there is someone available to help with writing issues.

Criticism is always difficult, no one likes to be told bad news, and no one likes to give such news. However, both parties must keep the end goal in sight – to get your paper published. Think of it as doing whatever it takes. If it means working with an editor or rewriting one more time, do it. You do not need to feel embarrassed, it is not a failing of yours; it is simply one more step that must be taken on this long journey. 

Be tough, listen to the criticism and move on. Learn what you need to learn, and get your paper published!