Monday, October 10, 2016

Anonymity

One of the most common reasons I return a newly submitted manuscript is because the authors did not remove all identifying information, such as the where the study was done (or the IRB location). Why is this important? The basis of peer review is that it is double blind, meaning the author does not know who the reviewers are nor the reviewers know who conducted the study. Everyone has personal biases, and making the review anonymous provides some safe guards.

From the reviewer side, he or she may know the author or the institution and if the reviewer was aware of it, he or she might be easier on the author or tougher based upon their beliefs. From the author side, they may feel the need to argue or complain to the reviewer if he or she was known. Keeping it anonymous provides distance for both parties.


No comments:

Post a Comment